Good informative article below entitled ‘Scientific study backs intelligent design’ but I have a few comments.   First, I would not have used the term ‘Intelligent Design’. Why? Because there is no clear definition for this term.  It means different things to different people and it is so divisive it causes many to disengage.   What we can say is that Darwinian-style Evolution is a theory not a fact.  I have been preaching this for years to my kids teachers who try to fill their heads with this fuzzy thinking.  Are there natural and other types of selection for a better genotype? Yes. We have the ‘Delicious Apple’, the ‘Hereford cattle’, and all the different breeds of dogs, cats, etc. so yes there is a mechanism for genetic change and stabilization both natural and assisted by man. But how do you get from a primordial soup to an amoeba or from an amoeba to a horse; and why don’t our evolutionists tell us that Dr. Leakey’s missing link called Lucy wasn’t a missing link after all?  Why is it that sharks or lampreys haven’t changed one gene in millions of years?  What about the Pre-Cambrian Explosion of Life forms in the Geologic time scale?  No one has adequately answered that question!  Why does man build spaceships, computers and massive skyscrapers while the ants build dirt mounds?  These are important questions that the myth of “Settled Science” omits from the domain of logical discussion.

“Cause-and-effect physical determinism…cannot account for the programming of sequence-dependent biofunction.’”

‘Scientific study backs intelligent design’

Some additional thoughts …

We are told that Chimps and Man share 96 – 99% of the same genes, but they neglect to tell us that man also shares 55% of the same genes with a banana. So what are we to conclude from this? First that the dogma of “Settled Science” attempts to stop any questioning or logical discussion of their sacred dogma as with the Global Warming hoax.

Secondly I think we can conclude that if chimps and man share 99% of the same genes, we may have over emphasized the determinative importance of adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine as the DNA bases.

So our vaulted scientists tell us that Darwin’s theory of evolution is a fact not a theory and in their hubris they talk about the Universe as if they know what this is when they should use the modifier ‘KNOWN’ universe.

Our scientists –while a very useful tool– don’t even know what gravity is or the cause of –as Einstein called it “Spooky Motion at a Distance”– or quantum entanglement

More information:

David Berlinski Explains Problems With Evolution.