Category Archives: Global Warming

RED PILL

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | April  23, 2017

({RED PILL}): The Globalist plan for global conquest was as so… to fit regional pieces into a global super-structure: The EU (28 countries) was to fit into NAFTA (3 countries) using TTIP as the connector, then the TPP (12 -18 countries) was to be used to connect the EU, NAFTA and TTIP to the Pacific Rim countries. This global structure –once completed– was to be further homogenized using UN-Agenda 21 (now 2030 Agenda). To fund the governance of such a massive system, a global tax was required: Carbon Taxes, which could be used as a tax and a ‘justifiable’ control mechanism for every single human on the planet. The final goal is a scientific dictatorship, they call a ‘Technocracy’ to protect mother earth through population reduction. This is not about orange hair, small hands, left or right, male or female or Islam. Islam is being used as a tool by the globalists: out of chaos comes order, a new order controlled by the money masters, who are the natural predators of man. The death of TPP, the Brexit and the populism of Marine Le Pen (even if she loses), has set this global plan back decades. Russia and Putin are being used as the ‘big bad wolf’ to scare their livestock (that’s you) back into the pen. While you are at work, paying your bills and your taxes and raising your family, this is the kind of shit these folks are thinking up. Stop being their fool. Now.

My Take on the 2016 Presidential Primary

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | April 06, 2016

police-850054_640

With Cruz and Kasich still in the game, Trump will not be able to achieve the 1,237 required delegates to win on the first vote at the Republican Convention to be held July 18–21 in Cleveland, Ohio.  On the first vote the delegates won are committed to vote for the primary winners in their district, state, etc. based on the particular rules of the state RNC apparatus.  If Trump does not have the requisite 1,237 votes on this first ballot, it goes to a second vote.  On the second vote, however, the delegates are uncommitted so can vote for whomever they choose or the party bosses tell them to vote for.  Most establishment Republicans do not want Trump, so a second vote is likely the end of the Trump candidacy.  We could see a 3rd and 4th vote before a candidate is chosen. Right now, rule 40 –which was designed to stop Ron Paul in 2012– only allows those who have won 8 states to be considered.  If this rule is not changed, the only two who can be considered are Trump and Cruz. Expect this rule to be changed just before the convention, allowing anyone to be considered, including Kasich.  On the second vote, it is likely to be Cruz since there is such fear and hatred for Trump’s populous policies and the fact that the RNC and others cannot control or manipulate Trump.  The RNC does not like Cruz because of his grandstanding in the Senate, but Cruz has been compromised and can therefore be controlled by blackmail.  Additionally, Cruz has very deep ties into the Bush Crime family so that is a plus.  The power brokers at the RNC will run an endgame to insert a key operative into the VP slot and the cake is baked.

Now the question is, can a Cruz campaign win against a Hillary or a Bernie?   I believe it is likely that the Trump supporters will feel cheated and thus either not vote or vote in opposition for the DNC candidate to show their displeasure to the RNC.  The RNC has been fully uncloaked by this fiasco and will be history.  The RNC knows this, but a Hillary or a Bernie president is much better for the RNC than a Trump in any event and so we will have business as usual.  The only benefit I can see in having another Democrat in the White House at noon on January 20th, 2017, is that when the massive financial bubble finally bursts, the Democrats will be blamed.

I’m not sure if this Republic based on the US Constitution and the rule of law can survive the criminality we are witnessing in every branch of our government, but there will be a reset of the economy and of the current political structure.  The only question for me is what will this new structure look like?  History has taught us that after a major reset (excepting 1776), the new regime is almost always much, much worse than the prior.  We live in very interesting times.  Buckle your seat-belts, it’s going to be a bumpy ride.


Additional NFO:

Why Obama and Hillary must stop Donald Trump at all costs

Michael Savage DESTROYS and Exposes Ted Cruz – 3/10/16

The Spectre of Globalism and what to do about it

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | Oct 25, 2015

Time to read, listen and learn…

Globalism“A spectre is haunting Europe — the spectre of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies.”

–Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels 1848
Communist Manifesto (Prologue)

And today, there is yet another spectre, only this spectre learned to use Karl Marx’s communism and all the other ‘–isms’ (whose common effect is to concentrate power),  in a grand conspiracy to place the entirety of humanity under its singular control. It has many names: New World Order, Global Governance, Globalism, the Network, Shadow Government, etc. but represents the same Anglo-American Establishment.  This is not merely a conjecture or a theory; but a well-documented fact found in their own writings, speeches and actions; and in the detailed writings of Quigley, Sutton, Griffin, Plummer and others, yet most of the structure and the purpose of this spectre remains unknown to the masses.

Unlike the tyrants we have studied in history, this new, fresh batch of authoritarian predators have a much improved arsenal of technological weapons to enslave humanity and they are moving rapidly to consolidate their control with the help of their paid technocrats, political talking heads, international money masters and corporate media organs.

The root of their power was created from and sustained by the ignorance of the masses. Who are the masses? That’s you and me bub.

If ignorance of this threat is the root cause of the enablement of this danger, perhaps the opposite would be the inoculation against this virus unleashed on the world by the predator class though education and the teaching again of the lost art of critical thinking.

THE CURE:

If you have a work-a-day job like I do or a long commute to and from work like I do, along with family responsibilities like I do, how on earth do you squeeze out enough time to become educated on important current and historical events?

The average American watches between 2.8 and 5 hours of TV per day. This wide variance depends on whose statistics you use (Nielsen or BLS), age, race and sex. In any event, it can be seen that a lot of TV is watched by Americans on a daily basis as a leisure activity and for news.

Researching for this article, I found thousands of articles on how fast people read, but most sited no authority or source for the generally agreed to speed of 250-300 words per minute. The very few who did site a source: Forbes, for example, all sited the same study which was actually a speed reading test by Staples. It’s worrisome that almost no one takes the time to site sources! This speed reading test is apparently a smart marketing campaign by Staples. In any event, Staples possesses the only statistic I was able to find and this truth-claim has crept into the collective consciousness as a well-established fact.

More detail from Forbes:

  •   Third-grade students = 150 words per minute (wpm)
  •    Eight grade students = 250
  •    Average college student = 450
  •    Average “high level exec” = 575
  •    Average college professor = 675
  •    Speed readers = 1,500
  •    World speed reading champion = 4,700

So if the average American adult can read say 300 words per minute, how many words can they read in 5 hours? The math is simple: 300 wpm X 60 minutes = 18,000 words per hour; times 5 hours = 90,000 words per day. Even if we cut this number by half, that is a lot of words!

Books have an average of 350 words per page according to Writers Services so theoretically the average American could read 257 pages per day rather than watching 5 hrs. Per day of TV. 257 pages per day seems a bit high to me and of course for many, reading is not a leisure activity and thus we aren’t comparing apples to apples here, but it does drive home the point that if most American chose to become educated, they could prioritize their time to provide for their own self-education on matters that matter.

The reason I took the time to go through this analysis was to prove to my fellows and to myself that we do indeed have the time to read some of the most important books of our era, and this reading and resultant enlightenment would change the world we live in permanently for the good. It would usher in true human freedom by putting the powers that shouldn’t be out of business. This is not just another Utopian ideal, since their power has been proven on these pages to be a function of our collective ignorance. What is Utopian is the expectation that enough people will take time away from their leisure to become informed. What are some of these important books? There are many, but here are a few key books that I believe would change the world we live in forever and for the better:

  • Quigley’s Anglo-American Establishment – 354 pages
  • Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony C. Sutton 165 pages
  • Wall Street & the Rise of Hitler by Antony C. Sutton 148 pages
  • Wall Street and FDR by Antony C. Sutton 177 pages
  • Dishonest Money by Joseph Plummer 175 pages

Total pages = 1,019

At 51.4 pages per hour, the average time to read: 19.8 hours, say 20. So if we borrowed an hour per day from our TV time to read, we could complete the entire reading list above in 20 days.  I suppose it would take much longer depending on the density of new information and gravitas of what is being read, but this gives us some sort of basis.

Now I chose the short reading list above from a much larger and more comprehensive list  based on the importance of the information contained therein and the shortness of the book. I believe all these books are available for free  on the author’s web site (Joe Plummer) or as a text or PDF on the internet; but if you prefer to touch the book as I do, you can order a real book from Amazon or other booksellers. There are many other equally important books to add to your reading list –some longer and some shorter– that would be good supplements and additions after you have read the above books. A more complete list can be found here.

Now that we have reallocated / adjusted our TV-viewing time a bit, it’s time to look at our long commute to and from work chasing those little green energy flakes we call money. You can chose whatever you like to listen to, but why waste all that time listening to the same establishment drivel every day on the radio. Time to load your smart device with some real NFO. There are many, many sources, but I prefer to download and listen to those who have actually read Quigley. After you have read Quigley and realize just who this man was, I think you will agree. Two of my favorite sources that provide free downloads of their videos and podcasts are:

To get you started, here are two excellent links you can download and place on your smart device:

Additional Reading at ClearNFO:

Interesting background from two select videos: first one on UN Agenda 21 with Rosa Korie and the second on Technocracy by Patrick Wood.  Interesting to note that Patrick Wood was good friends and co-author with the infamous and brilliant historian Antony C Sutton.  Enjoy!

ROSA KOIRE ~ “Secrets Behind U.N. AGENDA 21 & Global Sustainability”

Published on Aug 21, 2014

Age Of Truth TV presenter Lucas Alexander is interviewing American author, truth researcher, Director of the Post Sustainability Institute and former forensic commercial real estate appraiser, ROSA KOIRE in the film: “Secrets Behind U.N. AGENDA 21 & GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY” [Age Of Truth*TV]

Rosa Koire is the author of the book “Behind The Green Mask” and is giving controversial lectures all over the world, exposing what she believes, is the real control agenda behind the 300 page, 40 chapter action plan of U.N. Agenda 21, which was approved and implemented locally by 179 countries at the Rio De Janeiro earth summit in 1992.

~ “UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. INVENTORY AND CONTROL” ~ Rosa Koire

Rosa Koire is connecting U.N. Agenda 21 with the political, financial and globalized New World Order plan, which most alternative truth researchers claim is a fully controlled One World Government, implemented through a “Problem, Reaction, Solution” strategy.

A fascinating and eye-opening in-depth interview with Rosa Koire by Age Of Truth TV, filmed at the Open Mind Conference at Audonicon, Skanderborg – Denmark on the September 21, 2013.

Premiere and cinematic screening / presentation before a live audience was held at PH Caféen, Copenhagen on August 20, 2014.

Rosa Koire:
“Secrets Behind U.N. AGENDA 21 & Global Sustainability”

Interviewed by: Lucas Alexander
Filmed by: Lauge Felix Black, Erik Hansen-Hansen, Mike Kirkeby Pedersen.

Special Thanks:
Rosa Koire, Open Mind Conference, Mads Wedel-Ibsen, Frank Bjerregaard Rasmussen, Carol Coenca, Sonny Wilson, UP, Jacob Fuglsang Mikkelsen

© AGE OF TRUTH TV 2013


Caravan To Midnight – Episode 250 Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising

Published on Mar 20, 2015

Episode 250 – Today we welcome Patrick Wood on board to show us why the U.S., and the world for that matter, has transformed the way it has; and to bring light to the solutions that will quell these issues.

Buy This Caravan To Midnight Episode for 2.99
http://caravantomidnight.com/product/…
Please Subscribe At
http://caravantomidnight.com/

Reference notes:

Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising Interview

Patrick Wood

Patrick Wood

Author Patrick Wood discusses his recent book “Technocracy Rising”, in a 3-part interview. (Summary of parts, below)  Technocracy Rising

Patrick Wood is an author and lecturer who has studied elite globalization policies since the late 1970’s, when he partnered with the late Antony C. Sutton to coauthor Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II. He remains a leading expert on the elitist Trilateral Commission, their policies and achievements in creating their self-proclaimed “New International Economic Order.”

An economist by education, a financial analyst and writer by profession and an American Constitutionalist by choice, Wood maintains a Biblical world view and has deep historical insights into the modern attacks on sovereignty, property rights and personal freedom. Such attacks are epitomized by the implementation of U.N. policies such as Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, Smart Growth and in education, the widespread adoption of Common Core.

Wood is a frequent speaker and guest on radio shows around the nation. His current research builds on Trilateral Commission hegemony, focusing on Transhumanism, Technocracy and scientism, and how these are co-opting economics, politics and religion around the world.

Technocracy, Trilaterals & TPP: An Interview with Patrick Wood

Published on Sep 11, 2015 by Richard Grove with Tragedy and Hope

Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising Interview (Part 1 of 3) Length – 1:13:53
Part 1: Energy based Currency, Columbia University origins of Technocracy, Eugenics, Population Control, and Agenda 21, origins of Positivism and Scientism;

Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising Interview (Part 2 of 3) Length –  56:40
Part 2: Trilaterals, CFR, Rockefellers, U.N., 1992 Rio Conference, Agenda 21 and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP);

Patrick Wood: Technocracy Rising Interview (Part 3 of 3) Length – 57:21
Part 3: Wood’s work with Antony C. Sutton, the Origins of the Trilateral Commission, Trilaterals and Larry King, and how the Trilateral Commission influenced the U.S. Govt. since 1973 to present day. Thanks to Ernie & Donna Hancock at FreedomsPhoenix.com for the use of their studio, and to Rick Malchow for his assistance in bringing you this interview.

Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse Of Global Transformation Paperback – December 29, 2014 by Patrick M. Wood (Author)

Technocracy Rising by Patrick Wood

Technocracy Rising by Patrick Wood

Global warming is Social Engineering

Global warming is Social Engineering… is the snow black? Of course not. Is Global warming actually Global Cooling? How brainwashed are you? Experts say you should believe anything that comes out of their bought and paid for mouths. Can you think for yourself? Are you capable of objective, critical thought? Do you know what the scientific method is or what empirical evidence is? Science by consensus is not science at all but propaganda as anyone capable of critical thought would immediately recognize. Stop being their trained Lemmings and think for your selves.

It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.

    This subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship. Anaxagoras maintained that snow is black, but no one believed him. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. . . . It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.   Bertrand Russell’s “Impact of Science on Society” (Page 30)

Is Climate Change Dangerous?

Published on Aug 10, 2015

David Dilley, former NOAA Meteorologist and current CEO and senior research scientist – Global Weather Oscillations, Inc., gives a presentation on Mind Your Own Business TV with Debi Davis. Mr. Dilley provides the viewer a full picture and understanding of climate change cycles and carbon dioxide cycles. Mr. Dilley combines his own research with peer reviewed research from other scientists and applies it to what is happening today, and to the likely dangerous climate change that will occur between the years 2019 to 2050.

Visit David’s website at: www.GlobalWeatherCycles.com

Massive lies from NOAA… aka the politicization of science …

The day Al Gore was born there were 7000 polar bears on Earth.

aaalgore

Today, only 26,000 remain. – – Rufus Kings

Global warming strikes Peru… 170,000 alpacas die during brutal winter weather in Peru

Geopolitics 101:

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | July 14, 2015

Building a New World Order

Building a New World Order

The idea behind ‘Anglo-American‘ Geopolitics is to remove the concept of the ‘nation-state’ and replace it with global governance: a single point of control. To do this, our masters need to fuse 1) the North American Union; 2) the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and 3) the European Union (EU) into one organization. Monies from carbon taxes will help support this governing bureaucracy — ergo the need for man-made global warming. They still need China, Russia, Iran and some other stragglers to join the club of one. Libya, Syria and many others have been dealt with. Ukraine is being used to draw Russia into making the mistake of attacking. To accomplish this grand scheme, they need a major global crisis to bring everyone to heal so that they can save the world from the problems they created.

Global Warming 101

mountains-482689_640Why do so many believe in the Hoax of Global Warming? Because in our current education system, students are not taught or encouraged to develop critical thinking —that would be dangerous– but rather, taught to memorize by rote an agglomeration of disconnected data points purposefully deprived of context; whose validity rests on some predetermined authority; and whose ultimate goal is in only the getting of a check mark on the next test. Actual thinking requires effort, attention and focus; and so the mind becomes a lazy blob of mush easily directed and controlled by those whose job it is to control the masses. Thus, today’s truth is actually a collective mythos popularly termed ‘well-established’ fact or labeled ‘science’ but science by consensus is not science at all, but propaganda as anyone capable of critical thought would immediately recognize.

Why the founding member of Greenpeace is a Skeptic of Climate Change...
Why I am a Climate Change Skeptic

Short and to the point…
A Warning To The GloBull Warming Screamers by  Karl Denninger

Top NASA Climate Modeler (April 26, 2017):
Top NASA Climate Modeler Admits Predictions Are ‘Mathematically Impossible’
Published on April 26, 2017
Written by Dr. Duane Thresher, Climatologist

“Top American Climatologist, an expert in climate modeling, exposes the fallacy that current climate models provide a realistic or reliable prediction of future climate change. In a 1-2-3 step guide to disposing of the global warming debate Dr. Duane Thresher says successful modeling with modern computers is “mathematically impossible.”

Dr Thresher is among the elite of computer climate modelers. He has performed extensive work in climate proxy modeling at the University of Alaska and the Alfred Wegener Institute, Germany. He earned his PhD in Earth & Environmental Sciences (climate modeling/proxies) from Columbia University and at NASA he worked for Dr. James Hansen, the father of global warming, and Dr. Gavin Schmidt.

Dr Thresher offers his step-by-step guide below:

  • 1. It is fundamentally mathematically impossible for climate models to predict climate.
  • 2. Climate proxies are far too inaccurate, unreliable, and sparse to prove anything about past global climate, e.g. that it was colder.
  • 3. Scientific consensus is not proof of global warming, just publication and funding bias.”

Waking the Lemmings

lemmings3Looks like the Wall Street Journal may have decided to stop being part of the Government echo chamber and engage their brain. Hope springs eternal that critical thought still lives, and may yet thrive some time in the future. Most American Lemmings, it seems, are content to repeat ‘authority’ figures ad nauseam as they are trained to do in our state-run education system. They never bother to consider the mindless, unproven drivel they haplessly repeat; and whose only foil against logic is to call names. The ability to critically analyze information seems to be lost on a majority of our fellows through time-tested washing of the brains by our scientific social engineers running amok in our media and our school systems.

The Myth of the Climate Change ‘97%’
What is the origin of the false belief—constantly repeated—that almost all scientists agree about global warming?  By Joseph Bast And Roy Spencer

Last week Secretary of State John Kerry warned graduating students at Boston College of the “crippling consequences” of climate change. “Ninety-seven percent of the world’s scientists,” he added, “tell us this is urgent.”

Where did Mr. Kerry get the 97% figure? Perhaps from his boss, President Obama, who tweeted on May 16 that “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.” Or maybe from NASA, which posted (in more measured language) on its website, “Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities.”

Yet the assertion that 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a man-made, urgent problem is a fiction. The so-called consensus comes from a handful of surveys and abstract-counting exercises that have been contradicted by more reliable research.

Additional Reading

 

Climate: The ’cause célèbre’ for a Global Tax

Karl Denninger

The cause célèbre for the NWO global tax; or ‘The continuing saga of the man-made global warming deception’.

Short, succinct reality-check from the brilliant mind of one Mr. Karl Denninger below on
Your Science Lesson for Today

More resources on the Global Warming Hoax here …  Global Warming is a HOAX

What does the the ‘Nobel Peace Prize’ mean?

1933_Nobel_Peace_Prize_awarded_to_Norman_AngellHave we not two brain cells to rub together to get a spark of understanding? Why do we –like Pavlov’s doggie– get all hot and bothered and salivate when someone gets the Nobel Peace Prize?

Consider that the most murderous president in recent history Barack Obama received this prize in 2009. This same president said and I quote: “I’m really good at killing people” when discussing his drone warfare in Pakistan.

The Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 went to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Albert Arnold (Al) Gore Jr. The IPCC has been caught twice falsifying global warming records and Gore is an absolute money-grubbing fraud.

The Nobel Peace Prize 2002 went to Jimmy Carter. Anyone who has followed this man’s statements over the past 20 years can only conclude that he is clinically insane.  I won’t waste the space here.  Discover this for yourself. Good Grief, he was actually attacked by a bunny rabbit.

The Nobel Peace Prize 1994 went to known terrorist Yasser Arafat who pilfered billions from the very people he was supposed to represent and secreted it off to a Swiss bank account.

The Nobel Peace Prize 1993 went to Nelson Mandela. If all your news comes from the MSM, you’d think this man was a saint, but look into the practice of ‘Necklacing’ in South Africa where they put a car or truck tire around the neck of a victim, pour gasoline into the tire and set it on fire. It takes a long time for this person to die an agonizing death. Nelson’s group and his wife practiced this regularly, yet Nelson did nothing to condemn or prevent these actions.

Need I mention that alleged War Criminal, Henry Kissinger (Heinz Alfred Kissinger) won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973?

BTW, Hitler was nominated but did not win.

So here you have a short history of the Nobel Peace Prize and the criminal psychopaths who win it … so next time you hear about it just remember that it means absolutely nothing about peace and everything about manipulating you the public.