Monthly Archives: November 2019

A History Written by Victors

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 18, 2019

I’ve been steeped in the Jewish Holocaust of WWII most of my life. I’ve read many books on the topic and have visited Holocaust museums to observe the documented horror and show my respects. In high school, I read ‘Man’s Search for Meaning’ by Viktor Frankl (Holocaust survivor, surviving Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Kaufering and Türkheim). In his book, Viktor describes in gruesome detail his time in the Nazi concentration camps and how he managed to survive. I credit this book with my own personal survival of a different holocaust some three decades later. My favorite 13-part British documentary ‘The Ascent of Man’ presented by British mathematician and historian and Polish-Jew Jacob Bronowski expressed profound and moving conclusions on the lessons of the Holocaust. I had Jewish rabbis as friends and neighbors, whom I’ve had long philosophical discussions with, helped repair fences (literally), move refrigerators, stayed in touch with over decades, eaten dinner with, watched their kids grow up, etc.

The Truth Fears No Questions

And I’ve watched all the historical documentaries you have depicting all the emaciated Jews behind barbed wire fences in Nazi concentration camps saved by the US Military. I’ve seen the stacks of shoes in piles next to the ovens at these same camps. And I heard of the lamp-shades made out of human skin, and I’ve heard that Hitler ordered the extermination of 6 million Jews and this was the Holocaust. And so today if you are really pissed at someone, you can call them Hitler which is the worst approved pejorative possible, since we all know it is a ‘well-established fact’ Hitler was a monster.

Despite all the above, I am no fool. After reading Quigley, Perloff and Sutton, I discover most of what I knew about WWII is just not true; and so, I wonder about the Holocaust too. Only problem, it is illegal to wonder about the Holocaust in 17 countries; and if you dare ask any questions here in the good old US of A –no matter how innocent– you are quickly labeled a ‘Holocaust denier’, attacked by the powerful ADL and may lose your job, your friends, your internet platform, etc. I must ask though, if this truth is so very true, why then must we enact laws to protect this fragile truth from critical scrutiny? I’m thinking the truth of the Holocaust might just be one of the biggest red pills ever.

What if the real monster was Winston Churchill? What if Churchill was a drunkard, gambler in debt up to his eyeballs to Rothschild; and what if Churchill delighted in firebombing 200,000 – 500,000 innocent men, women and children melting them into the pavement when there was zero military benefit for this mass murder. What if the gassing chambers were really to get rid of lice? What if the emaciated bodies were due to the Allied forces embargo? What if it were only 300 to 600,000 and not 6 million? What if FDR knew about the attack on Pearl Harbor prior to the attack and did nothing? What if Rockefeller’s Standard Oil was selling a special synthetic oil to Hitler (without which there would have been no war) while denying the same to our troops? And what if there were no lamp-shades made out of human skin? And what if “History is written by the victors.”?

Additional reading:

World War II – A Necessary Re-Evaluation

Sanctions Are War By Other Means by James Corbett (May 14, 2023)

Defrauding America

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 18, 2019

On this Memorial Day, the nation honors the 58,000 dead American soldiers killed in the CIA initiated and directed Vietnam War. The mass media says virtually nothing about the ugly side of that war, in which GI’s were cannon-fodder, and used to protect and escalate the drug trafficking into the United States.

Flag-draped coffins of eight American Servicemen killed in attacks on U.S. military installations in South Vietnam, on February 7, are placed in transport plane at Saigon, February 9, 1965, for return flight to the United States. Funeral services were held at the Saigon Airport with U.S. Ambassador Maxwell D. Taylor and Vietnamese officials attending. # AP

Even in the death GI’s were used by the CIA. An officer heading a group of investigators from the army’s Criminal Investigation Division uncovered a large-scale heroin smuggling scheme. The group filed reports with the Pentagon, describing how the bodies of the dead GI’s were gutted, and filled with sacks of heroin. Approximately fifty pounds of heroin with a multi-million dollar street value were stuffed into each body…Document’s accompanying the drug-filled corpses were coded so that people at Air Force Bases in the United States, including at Travis and Norton air-force bases, could remove the drugs upon arrival in California.

In typical fashion, the military hierarchy reacted to the report by disbanding the investigative team. Other reports plus those given to me by my CIA contacts, provide further confirmation of this sordid practice. This coverup made possible the continued drug smuggling and constituted criminal coverup.

Crates returning to the U.S from Vietnam on military aircraft often contained bags of heroin, and the coded labels false indicated the contents were military supplies. The coverup by the military, the CIA,and the Justice Department, were part of the overall epidemic.

These aspects of the CIA-initiated and directed Vietnam War, and the debauchery of American GI’s, were never addressed at Memorial Day ceremonies. Instead the American public was led to believe that the hundreds of thousands of dead, maimed, and injured Americans suffered for an honorable cause, protecting the United States.

Even the heads of veteran organization, including the Veteran Foreign Wars and the American Legion, withheld this information from their members.

This is not to discredit those brave men and women who were ordered into battle and who endured such terrible fear, injury and death. But the American public must wake up, to realize that the extreme losses in human life and dignity were a farce perpetrated upon them.

Rodney Stitch –
From his book, “Defrauding America”.

Additional reading:

The CIA Drug Connection Is as Old as the Agency
By Larry Collins, International Herald Tribune
Dec. 3, 1993

ClearNFO:

On the matter of the Vietnam War…

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 17, 2019

Vietnam was an ugly, pointless war based on a US Government lie called the ‘Gulf of Tonkin Incident’. This undeclared war in Southeast Asia brutally slaughtered and maimed millions of innocent men, women and children, including our young American boys: 58,315 KIA; 153,303 WIA; 1,618 MIA; & 778 POWs. It changed this country forever; enriching only the defense contractors, the MIC and those who financed this war effort. Though many of my fellows in high school had been sent off to Vietnam –only to return in body bags– I was too young to go; but I watched the slaughter and the returning body bags on TV every night from the safety and comfort of my home. The Vietnam War brought us the anti-war movement, psychedelic drugs (aided and promoted by the CIA), eastern religions, free love, increased state domestic power and surveillance, huge debts owed to the central bankers and changed American culture forever.

Later, my college biology teacher told me he had served in Vietnam. He was a fit, small guy with a wily, dry sense of humor, and a pure white shock of hair jetting out of his hairline; and he was a good teacher. He served in the ground infantry and said he enjoyed his stay there so much he re-enlisted three times. I asked him what he learned in Vietnam and he said how to survive. Later when I was running my own business I hired several Vietnam veterans. Most would never speak a word about their time there, but two confided in me. One made me swear that I would never tell his wife he served in Vietnam since he had never told her. I found this to be very strange if not implausible. Another broke down and cried in my office for all the bad things he had done. He had even been ordered to kill US POWs since they represented a threat to the US negotiations. Another Vietnam veteran told me that all their ammo was locked up in a bunker and they couldn’t return fire, until they received approval from headquarters. My father-in-law also served in Vietnam, but never speaks of his time there.

Since WWII, the US has not declared one single war, yet since that time our war efforts have increased exponentially as well as our debt to those who finance these undeclared wars; and if we choose to look over the walled garden in which we live, we will discover that every single one of these wars are based on lies similar to the lie which brought us Vietnam. And so it goes.

Why does Facebook hate me?

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 15, 2019

I am not a violent person; I am not a criminal; I do not promote violence or hatred; I have never shared illegal or sexually explicit photos or paintings on my Facebook pages– ever.

So why does Facebook hate me so?

Or the question is: why have so many of my posts been banned from FB – the majority of which FB doesn’t even bother to list or show me – thus keeping me in the dark as to what my infraction was? I am left only to guess.

Many years ago, in the beginning or my FB experience, I was permanently banned for my strong, anti-abortion postings. I wrote FB a letter and they changed the permanent ban to a 45-day ban. From this, I became much more circumspect, sophisticated and clever in my anti-abortion posts which worked-well to avoid the Facebook censors. From here, Facebook would delete various postings and pictures for reasons that are irrational as far as I can determine. I’ve always thought of it as “Algorithms and/or AI gone wild.” For example, they deleted a beautiful non-sexual classic renaissance oil painting I had hanging in my house since I was a child that depicted the side of a woman’s breast. They deleted a picture of a pre-pubescent boy or girl (impossible to tell) in a canoe in the amazon jungle playing with a turtle — only the top of this child was bare. Obviously the FB algorithms are looking for patches of bare skin — not knowing exactly what they are seeing. I protested in every case and was denied in all but one.

My latest banning from Facebook occurred on 11/12/19 because as FB said I was “facilitate[ing] or coordinate[ing] crime activity likely to cause harm to people business or animals”. What had I done that was so criminal? I posted a fully clothed picture of Adam Schiff’s CIA Spy also known as the whistle-blower Eric Ciaramella eating dinner. I knew of several people who were banned for posting his name, so I made sure I did not post his name, just his photo. BTW, I had several other photos on my FB page of Eric, but for some reason FB noticed this one and banned me for 30 days accusing me of being a criminal. Had they done this in public, I would have sued them for slander.

BTW: Adam Schiff previously released Eric’s unredacted name in a deposition as did several other media outlets.

So it seems that I am not Facebook material. FB just doesn’t want me on their site for some reason since they keep insulting me and damaging my enjoyment of their platform.

Though my tax dollars paid for their predecessor LifeLog (without which FB would have never existed), FB is now a private company and can therefore abuse my first (and 4th) amendment rights at their will and pleasure for any reason whatsoever. And of course the courts must determine at some point if Facebook is just a platform or if it is a publisher; or something entirely new. Seems obvious to me that if Facebook is curating the content on their platform—and they are– they are indeed publishers. Facebook prefers to be a platform when it is convenient to them to avoid the legal constraints of being a publisher, but clearly they are much more than a platform – In addition to abusing their users’ 1^st and 4^th Amendments, they also serve as an effective propaganda organ –as did the old media– for the established power structure which currently promotes the religion of globalism and all its belief systems…

The Globalists’ Creed:

Sustainability via UN Agenda 21, 2030 and beyond
Man-made global warming and carbon taxes
Abortion on demand for any reason at any age
One world governance by a singular government or power structure – preferably the existing power structure
All 51 to 71 gender flavors recognized by FB
Vaccines are safe and effective
Supporting and promoting the lies, obfuscation and disinformation of the Mainstream Media cabal.
No borders with unlimited and unregulated immigration
Anti-male; anti-family; anti-white; anti-Christian

The Building Blocks for their unworkable New World Order:

Common Core (Control Education)
UN Agenda-21 & 2030 (Control Private Property Rights)
Affordable Care Act (Control Health Care)
Federal Reserve (Control Money)
The Patriot Act & the USA Freedom Act (Control Civil Liberties)
Free Trade Agreements like TPP (Control the movement of goods, services and people)
Strong Cities Network (SCN) (Global Police Force)
Global Warming (Install a Global Tax of $100 trillion)
CFR (Control of US Foreign Policy and Geopolitics)
Vaccines (Population Control)
Main Stream Media (Perception Control)
Open Borders (destroy the idea of the nation-state)
NATO (destabilize targeted countries)
Supreme Court (pack the Supreme Court; undermine the rule of law)
Terrorism and proxy army support (ISIS, Al Qaeda, Daesh, Al-Nusra Front, Wahhabism, etc.)

Other relevant links on this site

On the matter of man, woman and the family

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 12, 2019

It’s been my observation that women are at the heart of our culture and civilization. Women magically transform a house into a home and sit at the seat of a healthy, happy family –which is a fundamental building block of what I consider society. So from my perspective, where the women goes; so goes society.

Now in the patriarchal society of Western Christendom, there have been many abuses against women which our modern societies have attempted to correct. From my perspective, this attempted correction has been an abysmal failure on many counts but not all. In our rush for egalitarian perfection, we have ignored the fundamental physical, mental and emotional differences between male and female; and many have wondered why we should value the physically stronger male at all.

Not too long ago, man’s successful interface with the world depended on the physical as much –or more– than the intellectual; and so, it was up to the physically stronger male to offer safety and protection to the physically weaker female. For this arrangement, there was a contract: the contract said that if the male would protect the female, the female would build a home and provide children for the home. In today’s technical society, we still need the physical strength of the male for certain tasks, but this value proposition has been greatly depreciated.

So on the road to correct our patriarchal abuses, we have gained some parity in terms of self-determination for the female, but we have lost much in terms of our fundamental building block of society we call the family. We have lost a fundamental respect for the position the matriarch holds in building a strong, happy and healthy family. We have thrown her out into the streets to fend for herself and we have turned her into an object of sex for sex’s sake only. Innocence and virtue no longer have lasting value, but to be consumed on demand; and to be degraded. Her fertile womb from which the family springs has been turned into a death chamber for our next generation. Our naive and short-sighted rush for equality convinced us infanticide is a reasonable choice for family planning.

We have lost our wholesomeness, our innocence and our commitment to the idea of one man, one woman and one family.

We have shirked our responsibility; we fail to take ownership of our actions, and so we are turned over to our own devices and avarice.

Like cackling hyenas over a recent kill, we feast at the hoax sold to us as sexual freedom and equality, we choose death over life, debauchery over love and are left howling into the vast existential abyss of meaninglessness — without our families.

Google is Politic; and Google is YouTube.

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 12, 2019

Since the election of Trump, YouTube has been busy destroying the financial viability of many platforms using their services with which they disagree. All the myriad of actions have one thing in common, they reduce the money flow and eyeballs attracted by these independent platforms. This reduction in ad revenue reduces revenue not only to these independent content producers but to YouTube itself. Starting on December 10th of this year, YouTube’s new TOS will allow YouTube to completely delete any YouTube channel that it deems not financially viable. So what you have here is:

1) YouTube targeted a select set of independent content producers;
2) reduced their ability to generate income for both YouTube and the content producer;
3) and now they will be deleting these content producers because they are not financially viable.

Why would any business do something this boneheaded? Because they are not really a business in the normal sense of the word. They are a controlled adjunct of the US Federal Government’s deep state. Born of your tax dollars and used against the good US Citizens who paid the bill.

YouTube has been a subsidiary of Google since November of 2006 and of course Google was the result of a DARPA project with Stanford University in 1998.

Wikipedia: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is an agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of emerging technologies for use by the military.

Blocked by Facebook — Again

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 12, 2019

Memo to Facebook: How could a photo of a grown man –fully clothed– eating dinner as you term it: “facilitate or coordinate crime activity likely to cause harm to people business or animals”?

The picture above is of Adam Schiff’s CIA Spy a.k.a. ‘The Whistle-Blower’ who shall remain nameless.