Tag Archives: Mark Dice

Ted Kaczynski – Canary in the Coal Mine?

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | January 30, 2022

With the COVID Project in full swing, we are witnessing in real-time the dangers of leftism and technocracy Ted warned us about some 27 years ago.

Kaczynski as an assistant professor at UC Berkeley in 1968 Photo Credit: By George Bergman – https://opc.mfo.de/detail?photo_id=5349, GFDL 1.2, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6092944

Many of us remember Ted Kaczynski as the Unabomber who was arrested in 1996 for mailing or hand-delivering a series of bombs which killed three and injured twelve, but few have taken time to read the Unabomber’s Manifesto entitled Industrial Society and Its Future.   I’ve had Ted’s Manifesto on my reading list for some time now, but only recently took the time to actually read it.  I was amazed at the clarity and the astonishing prescience of this 1995 writing and recommend its reading to any students of history who seek original, sourced documents to sidestep the filters of media and academia.

Ted provides the most insightful definition and causes of ‘leftism’ –with examples– I’ve read to date.  There are many other nougats of insight concerning the power process, autonomy and the psychological condition modern man faces; providing me a better understanding why freewill, liberty and self-determination will necessarily evaporate if we move into the scientific dictatorship most of us now know as ‘technocracy’.

We need only look at the COVID Project currently underway to see this being played out in real time

Despite Ted’s prescience, I don’t think Ted was able to conceive of the reckless fumbling and crumbling of today’s COVID narrative resulting in a mass-awakening, which could subvert Ted’s dire predictions of a technological takeover. This awakening of the many has the potential to short-circuit Ted’s idea of the inevitable march into technological slavery.   Ted, admits technology is managed by some amorphous elite group of managers,  but apparently sees this process as non-directed or architected by any group.  Man’s loss of freedom is inevitable according to Ted, not by the scheming of the elite, but by the very nature of technological systems as they progress. Ted’s solution is revolution and destruction of these old technological systems to bring us back to pre-17th century technology levels, reasoning reform was not possible since the technological systems will remain.  Evocative of the avoidance of technologies by  Old Order Mennonites and Old Order Amish.

I’m guessing Ted was never exposed to Carroll Quigley, Antony C. Sutton, Technocracy, Inc. or –of course– the current COVID-directed project which clearly shows the bind we find ourselves in is not only about technology itself, but the purposeful, directed use of technology as a weapon by a few who would rule the world.  These would-be rulers of mankind and self-appointed masters of the universe have been sold a lie — a great deception.  They seek to satisfy their absurd vision of immortality using technology to merge with machines.   This incredible delusion of the elite and their technocrats require the creation of a new super-race through directed evolution and augmentation which would eventually separate them from the unwashed masses of human livestock they herd, fleece, skin and render.

Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton. –Bertrand Russell The Impact of Science on Society (ed. Routledge, 2016)

Ted seems to have justified the terrorizing, maiming, and killing of presumably innocent people as the only way to draw worldwide attention to his important task.  Ted was terrified of the impending doom for the fate of all mankind and so resorted to extreme measures to promote  his warning to as many people as possible for his revolution.

Paradoxically, Ted’s strategy to destroy the existing system, to then reboot into a new system, matches pretty well with current NWO plans which seek to reduce population, destroy and replace the monetary system, disrupt supply chains, erase borders, delete cultures, etc.  The major difference between Ted and the globalists are the endpoints.  Ted envisions a return of power to the individual, while the globalists envision the concentration of power in their hands.

Full text: Industrial Society and Its Future (1995) Written by Ted Kaczynski Mathematics professor

Outline of the ‘Industrial Society and Its Future’ – Theodore Kaczynski 1995 – 33 pages

  • INTRODUCTION
  • THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM
  • FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY
  • OVERSOCIALIZATION
  • THE POWER PROCESS
  • SURROGATE ACTIVITIES
  • AUTONOMY
  • SOURCES OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS
  • DISRUPTION OF THE POWER PROCESS IN
  • MODERN SOCIETY
  • HOW SOME PEOPLE ADJUST
  • THE MOTIVES OF SCIENTISTS
  • THE NATURE OF FREEDOM
  • SOME PRINCIPLES OF HISTORY
  • RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IS UNAVOIDABLE IN INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY
  • TECHNOLOGY IS A MORE POWERFUL SOCIAL FORCE THAN THE ASPIRATION FOR FREEDOOM
  • SIMPLER SOCIAL PROBLEMS HAVE PROVED INTRACTABLE
  • REVOLUTION IS EASIER THAN REFORM
  • CONTROL OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR
  • HUMAN RACE AT A CROSSROADS
  • HUMAN SUFFERING
  • THE FUTURE
  • STRATEGY
  • TWO KINDS OF TECHNOLOGY
  • THE DANGER OF LEFTISM
  • FINAL NOTE
  • NOTES

Additional, related information:

The ‘Power Process’: Ted Kaczynski’s “The Power Process” is a psychological need in humans to have goals, work towards them, achieve them at a reasonable rate, and do so with autonomy.1 It has four elements: goal, effort, and attainment of goal. The three most clear-cut elements are goal, effort, and attainment of goal.023 The fourth element is more difficult to define and may not be necessary for everyone.0 Kaczynski theorizes that to have healthy, functional lives, people must formulate goals and exert nontrivial efforts to attain them. Reaching goals without effort is not sufficient; reaching goals without effort is not sufficient.4 Kaczynski offers the trend that “leisured, secure aristocracies that have no need to exert themselves usually become bored, hedonistic, and demoralized.”


Ted Kaczynski: The System’s Neatest Trick

  1. What the System Is Not
  2. How the System Exploits the Impulse to Rebel
  3. The System’s Neatest Trick
  4. The Trick Is Not Perfect
  5. An Example

Contact: ClearNFO on MeWeGabVKTelegramBitChute; or via email at ClearNFO@gmail.com

The Fact Checker’s guide for detecting FAKE news…

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | Dec 13, 2016

Brining your ‘Bullshit Protector’ up to speed…

FAKE NEWS

On the matter of FAKE news.  After the painful and unexpected loss of their rigged 2016 presidential election, our overlords have come up with a new method to constrain the alternative news using their newly minted Ministry of Truth; so I thought now would be a good time to find out how to determine what is fake and what is not.

There are many kinds of fake news sites. On one end of the spectrum, you have news satire sites like The Onion or the Babylon Bee that make no bones about what they are up to. They blatantly make outlandish claims like the US will be painting the White House pink. This pink story even fooled the official Chinese news service who embarrassingly repeated this fake, but very funny story. This was a painful lesson for our authoritarian Chinese friends, but a lesson none the less they have yet to learn.  They continue to be fooled.  I read the Onion for fun, but never, ever post the Onion articles to my FB page, since many will share and re-post as fact.

Another kind of fake news site is one that does not source any of their fact-claims, they just make statements of opinion and present them as fact. They may be true or not, but can never be trusted. Usually just click-bait to satisfy your own prejudices: think confirmation bias.

Other sites are run or financed by the CIA for a myriad of reasons. One of their favorite tricks is to place something in the news that will later prove to be false. The fake news item is repeated by all those in the alt media who do no fact checking or sourcing, thus making the alt news folks look stupid… and many are. It’s a fun game.

Another CIA game is the limited hangout. The CIA uses this technique when they have been caught with their pants down. They will release just enough true information to give credibility but try to steer the public around the real data –or unanswered questions– hidden within. This is my opinion on Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald and The Intercept.  Why?  Check my articles at ClearNFO: search for Snowden. (The Intercept,  somehow escaped inclusion in The FAKE 200;  heavy /S)

NOTE: It is important to realize that as of July 2nd, 2013 the US Government repealed the Propaganda Ban on Government-Made News for Americans, making it open season with billions to spend to lie and deceive the American public with our own money. Cool. Our representatives actually vote for this shit.  U.S. Repeals Propaganda Ban, Spreads Government-Made News to Americans with the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act

I’ve divided the News into the following four (4) Categories:
1. FAKE but fun
2. FAKE with malice and forethought
3. FAKE without malice or forethought
4. REAL news sites

***NEWS Categories***

-FOR FUN
• News satire sites like ‘The Onion
• I’ve listed others at the bottom of this article.

-WITH MALICE & FORETHOUGHT
(Key Indicators: Heavy use of logical fallacies, omission of key data, concentrated ownership, interlocking board of directors and ties to big business and big government )
• MSM: ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, NYT, Washington Post, etc.
• The Economist
• WSJ
Wikipedia  yes, our beloved Wikipedia … sad but true.
• CIA PSYOPS
— Working with the MSM to shape public opinions (see Operation Mockingbird)
— Setting up fake news sites to help paint public landscape
— Releasing plausible but fake stories to embarrass those who repeat without verifying
— Limited Hangouts: Example ‘The Intercept’. Characteristics: well-funded and CIA connections. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting — sometimes even volunteering — some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.

-WITHOUT MALICE OR FORETHOUGHT:
• Blinded by ideology
• Blinded by the desire to please their financial supporters
• Lazy, ignorant

-REAL NEWS SITES:
Good: James Corbett of The Corbett Report (See my links tab at ClearNFO for more good sites)
Bad: CFR.  The CFR is one of the major sources of evil on this planet, but they are generally very truthful about what their plans are.  You may have to read between the lines a bit and it helps if you understand their origin and their plans for a one world government.  A good place to start is with James Perloff’s excellent book,  The Shadows of Power or with The Quigley Formula video on YouTube by G. Edward Griffin.

WHAT TO LOOK FOR:
• Where does their money come from?
• Who is on their board of directors?
• Who are the owners?
• Do they site sources? (quoting anonymous sources with no evidence is a sure tip-off)
• Do they date their news articles?
• Do they EXAGGERATE their headlines?
• Does their headline match the content?
• Is the site geared for click-bait?
• Reputation? Good, bad or none?

Notable news satire outlets

  • Academia Caţavencu (Romania)
  • The Beaverton (Canada)
  • The Betoota Advocate (Australia)
  • Broken Newz
  • The Chaser (Australia)
  • The Civilian (New Zealand)
  • The Noose (Singapore)
  • The Clinic (Chile)
  • The Daily Currant (U.S.)
  • The Daily Mash (UK)
  • Disassociated Press
  • “El Mundo Today” (Spain)
  • El Jueves (Spain)
  • Faking News (India)
  • Feral Tribune (Croatia)
  • Frank (Canada)
  • Le Gorafi (France)
  • Grönköpings Veckoblad (Sweden)
  • Lush For Life (U.S.), abandoned 2007
  • Moskovskaya Komsomolka (Russia)
  • National Report (U.S.)
  • NewsBiscuit (UK)
  • The Onion (U.S.)
  • The Oxymoron (UK)
  • The Pan Arabia Enquirer (Middle East)
  • The Phoenix (Ireland)
  • Private Eye (UK)
  • SatireWire (U.S.)
  • ScrappleFace (U.S.)
  • Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (U.S.)
  • The Late Show with Stephen Colbert (U.S.)
  • Titanic (Germany)
  • The True North Times (Canada)
  • Uncyclopedia’s UnNews
  • The UnReal Times (India)
  • Weekend Update from Saturday Night Live (U.S.)
  • Weekly World News (U.S.)
  • Zaytung (Turkey)

If the news site contains the following domain names, it is likely a purveyor of fake news:

Additional NFO…

WAYNE MADSEN | 28.11.2016 | OPINION
The Major Purveyor of ‘Fake News’ is the CIA-Corporate Complex

The Truth About Fake News | Russia Hacked U.S. Election For Donald Trump?

 

http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/11/27/revealed-how-us-government-media-complex-are-the-masters-of-fake-news/

U.S. Repeals Propaganda Ban, Spreads Government-Made News to Americans

The Smith–Mundt Act of 1948 banned the US Government from producing propaganda aimed at US Citizens.  On July 2, that came silently to an end with the implementation of a new reform passed in January. The result: an unleashing of thousands of hours per week of government-funded radio and TV programs for domestic U.S. consumption in a reform initially criticized as a green light for U.S. domestic propaganda efforts.

Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 (part of the National Defense Authorization Act) has repealed the domestic prohibition, allowing the government’s broadcasting to be directed at/created for Americans for the first time in over 40 years. Jul 15, 2013

BBG (Broadcasting Board of Governors): The mission of the Broadcasting Board of Governors is to inform, engage, and connect people around the world in support of freedom and democracy. The agency’s mission is reinforced by those of the individual broadcasters that are overseen by the BBG.

APPLE PIE PROPAGANDA? THE SMITH–MUNDT ACT BEFORE AND AFTER THE REPEAL OF THE DOMESTIC DISSEMINATION BAN by Weston R. Sager

The 25 Rules of Disinformation | May 24, 2011
From Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist) by H. Michael Sweeney. These 25 rules are everywhere in media, from political debates, to television shows, to comments on a blog.


More on this topic… 

Who is Behind “Fake News”? Fake Videos and Images
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, May 24, 2018

Richard Dolan Show April 16, 2018. UFOs, Fake News, and the Future of Free Speech

Update 9/25/23: Mark Dice on Wikipedia: IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW