Tag Archives: Bertrand Russell

Bertrand Russell – Selected Quotes

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | June 15, 2023

BERTRAND RUSSELL Red Lion Square, London WC1. 1982 Sculptor Marcelle Quinton.

Bertrand Russell (18 May 1872 – 2 February 1970)

Selected quotes from 1953:

“Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.”

Bertrand Russell – The Impact of Science on Society  (January 1, 1953)

“Anaxagoras maintained that snow is black but no one believed him. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will fay different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at: First, that the influence of the home is obstructive; second, not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before age ten; third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective; fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate it is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark grey.”

Bertrand Russell – The Impact of Science on Society  (January 1, 1953)

 

Ted Kaczynski – Canary in the Coal Mine?

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | January 30, 2022

With the COVID Project in full swing, we are witnessing in real-time the dangers of leftism and technocracy Ted warned us about some 27 years ago.

Kaczynski as an assistant professor at UC Berkeley in 1968 Photo Credit: By George Bergman – https://opc.mfo.de/detail?photo_id=5349, GFDL 1.2, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6092944

Many of us remember Ted Kaczynski as the Unabomber who was arrested in 1996 for mailing or hand-delivering a series of bombs which killed three and injured twelve, but few have taken time to read the Unabomber’s Manifesto entitled Industrial Society and Its Future.   I’ve had Ted’s Manifesto on my reading list for some time now, but only recently took the time to actually read it.  I was amazed at the clarity and the astonishing prescience of this 1995 writing and recommend its reading to any students of history who seek original, sourced documents to sidestep the filters of media and academia.

Ted provides the most insightful definition and causes of ‘leftism’ –with examples– I’ve read to date.  There are many other nougats of insight concerning the power process, autonomy and the psychological condition modern man faces; providing me a better understanding why freewill, liberty and self-determination will necessarily evaporate if we move into the scientific dictatorship most of us now know as ‘technocracy’.

We need only look at the COVID Project currently underway to see this being played out in real time

Despite Ted’s prescience, I don’t think Ted was able to conceive of the reckless fumbling and crumbling of today’s COVID narrative resulting in a mass-awakening, which could subvert Ted’s dire predictions of a technological takeover. This awakening of the many has the potential to short-circuit Ted’s idea of the inevitable march into technological slavery.   Ted, admits technology is managed by some amorphous elite group of managers,  but apparently sees this process as non-directed or architected by any group.  Man’s loss of freedom is inevitable according to Ted, not by the scheming of the elite, but by the very nature of technological systems as they progress. Ted’s solution is revolution and destruction of these old technological systems to bring us back to pre-17th century technology levels, reasoning reform was not possible since the technological systems will remain.  Evocative of the avoidance of technologies by  Old Order Mennonites and Old Order Amish.

I’m guessing Ted was never exposed to Carroll Quigley, Antony C. Sutton, Technocracy, Inc. or –of course– the current COVID-directed project which clearly shows the bind we find ourselves in is not only about technology itself, but the purposeful, directed use of technology as a weapon by a few who would rule the world.  These would-be rulers of mankind and self-appointed masters of the universe have been sold a lie — a great deception.  They seek to satisfy their absurd vision of immortality using technology to merge with machines.   This incredible delusion of the elite and their technocrats require the creation of a new super-race through directed evolution and augmentation which would eventually separate them from the unwashed masses of human livestock they herd, fleece, skin and render.

Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton. –Bertrand Russell The Impact of Science on Society (ed. Routledge, 2016)

Ted seems to have justified the terrorizing, maiming, and killing of presumably innocent people as the only way to draw worldwide attention to his important task.  Ted was terrified of the impending doom for the fate of all mankind and so resorted to extreme measures to promote  his warning to as many people as possible for his revolution.

Paradoxically, Ted’s strategy to destroy the existing system, to then reboot into a new system, matches pretty well with current NWO plans which seek to reduce population, destroy and replace the monetary system, disrupt supply chains, erase borders, delete cultures, etc.  The major difference between Ted and the globalists are the endpoints.  Ted envisions a return of power to the individual, while the globalists envision the concentration of power in their hands.

Full text: Industrial Society and Its Future (1995) Written by Ted Kaczynski Mathematics professor

Outline of the ‘Industrial Society and Its Future’ – Theodore Kaczynski 1995 – 33 pages

  • INTRODUCTION
  • THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM
  • FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY
  • OVERSOCIALIZATION
  • THE POWER PROCESS
  • SURROGATE ACTIVITIES
  • AUTONOMY
  • SOURCES OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS
  • DISRUPTION OF THE POWER PROCESS IN
  • MODERN SOCIETY
  • HOW SOME PEOPLE ADJUST
  • THE MOTIVES OF SCIENTISTS
  • THE NATURE OF FREEDOM
  • SOME PRINCIPLES OF HISTORY
  • RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IS UNAVOIDABLE IN INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY
  • TECHNOLOGY IS A MORE POWERFUL SOCIAL FORCE THAN THE ASPIRATION FOR FREEDOOM
  • SIMPLER SOCIAL PROBLEMS HAVE PROVED INTRACTABLE
  • REVOLUTION IS EASIER THAN REFORM
  • CONTROL OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR
  • HUMAN RACE AT A CROSSROADS
  • HUMAN SUFFERING
  • THE FUTURE
  • STRATEGY
  • TWO KINDS OF TECHNOLOGY
  • THE DANGER OF LEFTISM
  • FINAL NOTE
  • NOTES

Additional, related information:

The ‘Power Process’: Ted Kaczynski’s “The Power Process” is a psychological need in humans to have goals, work towards them, achieve them at a reasonable rate, and do so with autonomy.1 It has four elements: goal, effort, and attainment of goal. The three most clear-cut elements are goal, effort, and attainment of goal.023 The fourth element is more difficult to define and may not be necessary for everyone.0 Kaczynski theorizes that to have healthy, functional lives, people must formulate goals and exert nontrivial efforts to attain them. Reaching goals without effort is not sufficient; reaching goals without effort is not sufficient.4 Kaczynski offers the trend that “leisured, secure aristocracies that have no need to exert themselves usually become bored, hedonistic, and demoralized.”


Ted Kaczynski: The System’s Neatest Trick

  1. What the System Is Not
  2. How the System Exploits the Impulse to Rebel
  3. The System’s Neatest Trick
  4. The Trick Is Not Perfect
  5. An Example

Contact: ClearNFO on MeWeGabVKTelegramBitChute; or via email at ClearNFO@gmail.com

Democrat vs. Republican and Trump

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | May 09, 2020

Of course there really is no such thing as Democrat vs. Republican, though I too use these terms as shorthand to help speed communication since these terms are in general use.

Carroll Quigley said it best:  “The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies… is a foolish idea. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”

In 2016 most of the Republicans hated Trump as much or more than the Democrats and could not be trusted to support the choice of the people – their people. The RNC did everything in their power to destroy Trump.   With few exceptions, the Republicans are liars and thieves just like the Democrats, so it really boils down to whose lies you prefer.

The term ‘Realpolitik’ was  coined by Ludwig von Rochau  in 1853: “The study of the forces that shape, maintain and alter the state is the basis of all political insight and leads to the understanding that the law of power governs the world of states just as the law of gravity governs the physical world.”

Henry Kissinger was a big proponent of ‘Realpolitik’. Today’s Realpolitik can be seen in the coercive and amoral actions of the established power structure and their controlled media, government and educational organs.  Red Team vs. Blue Team is just another tool to keep their livestock distracted, occupied and confused.   If you get most of your news from the MSM you will not be aware of this simple fact.  One good example is the Trans Pacific Partnership or TPP which would have ceded US Sovereignty to an unelected group of international business interests.  Did the MSM ever alert the American people they were about to lose their sovereignty?  Amazingly, most of your elected officials in both parties were for this nation-destroying treaty, misnamed an agreement to help get it passed in the Senate – even Ted Cruz and Mike Pence were for it before they were against it.  TPP would have been a major win for the One World Government enthusiasts, but Trump killed it.  Trump is now on their shit list. These people have power, money; and they own Big-Tech, Big-Pharma and the media.  They also own people like Fauci, Birx, Gates, Redfield (CDC) and Tedros (W.H.O.).

“Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.” –Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society (1953) pgs. 49-50

The world they have planned for us will not be a good place to live.  It will be a world of constant surveillance and control – the idea of freedom will be washed from our collective consciousness.  Our suspicions surrounding the COVID Pandemic are possible and may be probable though not easily provable.   This could be just another attempt to remove Trump.

The COVID virus could be natural or man-made – though recent research point to man-made.  It could have been released by accident or on purpose. It could have been developed in China or in the USA or both.   We are gaining more and more evidence that is making this picture clearer every day.  We have some very good researchers making good progress on this now.   I expect we will discover the truth of the origin of SARS-CoV-2.

Calm before the storm?  I don’t know.  Certainly the existing power structure fighting Trump has committed serious crimes and would therefore desire to protect itself in any way possible without limits.

Coronavirus man-made:

Chris Martenson of Peak Prosperity Coronavirus: Are Our Scientists Lying To Us?